Ghanaian entertainment pundit and former artist manager, Lawrence Nana Asiamah Hanson, popularly known as BullGod, has stirred significant controversy following remarks made during a recent interview on Hitz FM’s “Daybreak Hitz” with host Andy Dosty and other media commentators.

BullGod,Andy Dosty and other media pundits are in the HitzFm studio during the ShowbizXtra__.
During the interview, BullGod referenced Proverbs 29:11, stating, “A fool gives full vent to his spirit, but a wise man quietly holds it back.” He used this scripture to support his assertion that Jesus Christ, by choosing to forgive repeatedly, exemplified foolishness. He argued that since Jesus came in human form and taught forgiveness extensively, this behavior aligns with the biblical definition of a fool,because human beings are fools.
This is not the first time BullGod has made such statements. He previously expressed similar sentiments on UTV’s “United Showbiz,” where he reiterated his views in the presence of gospel musician Empress Gifty and self-acclaimed a PR, Prophet Kumchacha. Both personalities attempted to challenge his assertions, urging him to reconsider and retract his statements, but BullGod remained steadfast.

__ A moment was captured when popular media personality and former artist manager, BullGod, controversially stated that the Son of God, Jesus Christ, is a fool because He came in human form.__
Andy Dosty, visibly taken aback during the Hitz FM interview, expressed his disappointment. He criticized Empress Gifty and Prophet Kumchacha for not taking a firmer stand against BullGod’s remarks during the earlier UTV program. Dosty emphasized the importance of respecting religious figures and teachings, especially on public platforms.
The public reaction has been swift and polarized. While some defend BullGod’s right to free speech, others condemn his comments as blasphemous and disrespectful to Christian beliefs. Religious leaders and organizations have yet to issue official statements, but discussions continue to intensify across social media platforms.
As the debate unfolds, it underscores the broader conversation about freedom of expression, religious sensitivity, and the responsibilities of public figures in shaping discourse.



















